Key themes and legal support. We are here to help.
Professor Nick Hopkins, Law Commissioner for Property Law
Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee
Commonhold is an alternative form of property ownership which was first introduced in 2002. It enables the residents of a building to own the freehold of their individual flat (called a “unit”) and to manage (or appoint someone to manage) the shared areas through a company. Consequently, no ground rent is payable and the homeowner has greater control over the property than leasehold. The ethos behind commonhold is that it is specifically designed to regulate the relationship between groups of people whose interests are broadly aligned. However, it has not proved popular and less than 20 commonholds have been created since the legislation came into force due to its lack of appeal to investors and developers alike and the difficulties with converting existing leasehold properties to commonhold. Mortgage lenders are reluctant to lend against commonhold units and consumers are still unfamiliar with it as a form of ownership.
The vast majority of flats are sold on a long leasehold basis. The root cause of many criticisms that have been levelled at leases is that they are time limited, do not provide outright ownership and the value of a lease tends to reduce over time. A leaseholder also has less control over its property than freehold owners, for example, a leaseholder may not be able to make alterations to their home without landlord's permission.
These cover:
Luke Hall, Minister for Rough Sleeping and Housing
Perceived problems associated with leasehold home ownership include:
The Commission’s recommendations and the government’s own reforms fall into two categories.
The overreaching objective is to provide a better deal for leaseholders by expanding and improving leaseholder rights and restoring confidence.
|
Laying the foundations for home ownership to be freehold |
Existing homes |
Future homes |
|
Houses |
Improved enfranchisement rights: existing leaseholders can buy the freehold and it will be cheaper too |
Leasehold house ban: new houses to be sold on a freehold basis (in line with Government proposal) |
|
Flats |
Improved enfranchisement rights: existing leaseholders can buy the freehold and convert to commonhold and it will be cheaper to do so |
Commonhold is available: Government to decide whether commonhold should be compulsory, incentivised, or optional Even if leasehold continues, the right to buy the freehold (including converting to commonhold) will be significantly cheaper |
The Commission acknowledges that the shift away from leasehold to freehold ownership will take time (a possible understatement in the context of many 999 year leases). As a result, the Commission recognises that the current leasehold system needs to be improved further now for the benefit of leaseholders. In addition to the proposals regarding improving enfranchisement and RTM, the Commission supports the government measures outlined in its response to tackling unfair practices in the leasehold market. Proposals include:
|
PROPOSALS |
|
Making the enfranchisement regime easier, quicker and cheaper for leaseholders to buy the freehold or extend their lease |
|
Enabling the conversion of existing leasehold properties to commonhold |
|
Making the right to manage easier, quicker and cheaper |
|
Regulating property agents |
|
Better regulation of service charges, permission fees and contribution to landlord's legal costs that leaseholders pay |
|
Reviewing the Law Commission's previous recommendation to abolish forfeiture in leasehold |
|
Tightening loopholes in the right of first refusal and extending the right to leaseholders of houses |
|
A government-backed pledge designed to help leaseholders with onerous ground rent terms; |
|
Requiring landlords to give lease information to prospective purchasers and setting a cap on what leaseholders can be charged for the provision of information |
|
Improving the process for recognising residents' associations and requiring landlords to provide them with information about leaseholders |
|
Banning the sale of leasehold houses. |
Law Commission
For those leaseholders:
Simon Davis, President of the Law Society of England and Wales
Katie Kendrick, Founder of the National Leasehold Campaign
The Commission has provided a clear signpost for the direction of travel for the future of home ownership in England and Wales. The Commission acknowledges that leasehold will not end overnight (or indeed for hundreds of years potentially), but, in the future, they hope commonhold will be preferred to leasehold. The report concludes that commonhold will not be used unless it is compulsory or adequate incentives are in place to make it preferable to leasehold.
It is apparent that the proposals will require a significant amount of Parliamentary time before legislation can be introduced. Currently, it looks like the proposals may have to take their place in the queue behind more pressing matters. That said, the issue of home ownership is high on the political agenda and the government has recognised the need for more housing to address the current housing crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic, and the requirement to “stay at home” that followed, has highlighted how much we depend on our homes. It also needs to get over the problems that commonhold as currently legislated has in dealing with multi-use properties, the complexity of many housing developments especially in cities, with commercial uses in the same building and different housing tenures (e.g. affordable uses). And mortgage funders need to be comfortable that it works for them.
Much will depend on the government's willingness to bring the changes into force and whether it chooses to reform the leasehold sector in whole or in part and whether leaseholders and developers/landlords will embrace the reforms. If the Government accepts the Commission's recommendation on commonhold, it would represent a radical change to home ownership and a re-writing of the text-books.
One thing does look certain, the reforms look set to change the way that property is owned, operated and used more comprehensively than at any time since the early 1920s.
|
Scotland's approach to commonhold |
|
England is one of very few jurisdictions that rely on long leases for housing. In Scotland, the law of the tenement which applies to flats is a form of commonhold. Commonhold structures are also frequently seen in Scottish housing developments, where landscaped areas, children's play areas, and other similar communal aspects of the development may be owned in common by all of the individual property owners within the development. Each individual house sold by the developer is sold including an equal share of the communal parts of the development. The common parts might then be managed through a Residents' Association (the terms of which are often specified in the title deeds) or a Factor or management company. Under the law of tenement, each flat is owned outright by a proprietor. The common parts of the larger building and any communal land outside the building, are owned collectively by all of the individual owners of the flats. They each own a legal share of the common parts but can access and use all of the communal property (similar to a couple who own their home as co-owners where each owns a legal share of the property but they occupy and use the whole of the property together). Maintenance responsibilities and obligations for these common parts might be specified in the title deeds for the individual flats. The Tenement (Scotland) Act 2004 sets a statutory framework for maintenance, which might be outsourced to a factor or simply dealt with by the owners directly. Affordable tenures such as shared ownership are easily accommodated within the Scottish system. |
Enfranchisement is a statutory right for long leaseholders to purchase the freehold of the property or to extend their lease. Collective enfranchisement enables leaseholders of neighbouring flats to join together to buy the freehold of their block. However, the process can be complex, expensive and often considered unfair with unexpected fees, procedural traps and costly delays.
Law Commission Report (LC 392) here.
Law Commission Summary here.
Key recommendations in a nutshell
|
Recommendations |
|
Leasehold owners of houses and flats to have the same enfranchisement rights |
|
Leaseholders of both houses and flats to have a new right to a lease extension for a term of 990 years at a peppercorn rent, in place of shorter extensions of 90 year leases for flats or 50 year leases for houses under the current law. If this recommendation is implemented it would see leaseholders only ever having to extend their lease once |
|
No ground rent to be payable under the extended lease |
|
Landlords should not use the lease extension process to impose new, onerous obligations |
|
New right for leaseholders with very long leases to “buy out” the ground rent under their lease without also having to extend the length of their lease. This will enable those leaseholders to free themselves from the ongoing obligation to pay ground rent |
|
Leaseholders should be able to enfranchise immediately after acquiring their lease rather than having to wait two years, as they do currently |
|
Flat owners should together be able to buy the freehold of premises or take over the management of a block where up to 50% of the building is commercial space rather than the current limit of 25% |
|
Groups of flat owners should be able to purchase the freehold or take over the management of multiple buildings (such as an estate) in one claim, rather than incurring the unnecessary expense of acquiring each building individually |
|
Requiring landlords to take “leasebacks” of units within the building which are not let to leaseholders participating in the claim in order to significantly reduce the price that leaseholders must pay |
|
Protecting leaseholders from obligations which are designed to generate a profit or provide an ongoing income stream for landlords |
|
Simplifying the enfranchisement process and creating a new concept of "residential unit" to refer to houses and to flats and the removal of separate rules for both to create a single process to remove the legal traps which cause claims to fail and which enable unfair procedural or tactical advantages for landlords with experience of the system |
|
Abolishing or controlling the requirement for leaseholders to pay their landlord's costs of a claim Leaseholders must currently pay their landlord’s uncapped costs, which can exceed the price that leaseholders have to pay to their landlords in an enfranchisement claim. The approach recommended depends on the Government’s response to the options the Commission presented about how to calculate the price but, either way, leaseholders will know up front what the costs of a claim will be |
|
Allowing enfranchisement disputes to be determined (wherever possible) in the Tribunal, replacing the current practice of claims progressing within the Tribunal and the county court |
The right to manage gives leaseholders the right to take over the management of their building without buying the freehold.
Law Commission Report (LC393) here.
Law Commission Summary here.
Key recommendations in a nutshell
|
Recommendation |
Objective |
|
Removing the requirement for leaseholders to pay the landlord's costs of the RTM claim |
In many cases, leaseholders will seek to claim the RTM because they are not in a position to pay the enfranchisement price. Giving leaseholders significantly more control and certainty over the costs they will incur will bring the RTM within reach of more leaseholders. |
|
Relaxing the qualifying criteria, so that the RTM can be claimed in respect of a wider range of buildings including leasehold houses, buildings with up to 50% commercial space, and self-contained parts of buildings which do not meet the qualifying criteria but which are capable of being managed independently. |
These changes will open up the RTM to more leaseholders in more properties. |
|
Permitting leaseholders to acquire the RTM over multiple buildings (such as an estate). |
Where buildings are already managed together, it makes sense that the leaseholders of those buildings should be able to act together to acquire the RTM over multiple buildings, provided that each building meets the qualifying and participation criteria in its own right. |
|
Reducing the number of notices that leaseholders must serve in order to claim the RTM, and giving the Tribunal the power to waive procedural mistakes in claim notices. |
To ensure that an RTM claim is not prevented due to technical, minor and inconsequential mistakes in the claim process. |
|
Clearer rules for the management of property which is not exclusive to the premises claiming the RTM, such as shared gardens and car parks. |
To ensure that either the parties or the Tribunal will have set out how dual management will be carried out, if the RTM company is to acquire management functions in respect of such property. |
|
The right for the RTM company to request information about the premises from a much earlier stage to facilitate a smoother handover of management functions. |
The RTM can make an informed decision about claiming the RTM, and can properly prepare for the handover of management functions. |
The Commission wishes to invigorate commonhold as a workable alternative to leasehold (for both existing and new homes) so that it's fit for purpose for all those involved with a commonhold, including converting leasehold premises to a commonhold, living in a commonhold, building a new commonhold, or who are lending in respect of a commonhold.
Law Commission Report (LC 394) here.
Law Commission Summary here.
Professor Nick Hopkins, Law Commissioner
|
Recommendation |
Objective |
|
Remove the requirement that conversion to commonhold needs the unanimous agreement of leaseholders and others with particular interests in the building. |
To enable more leaseholders to benefit from the commonhold regime by making it much easier to convert buildings from leasehold to commonhold, while providing protections for those who have not consented. |
|
Simpler, more cost-effective procedure for converting to commonhold. |
Put leaseholders in the driving seat and prevent tactical delays by those opposed to the conversion. |
|
Provide developers with the flexibility they need to build new commonhold developments. Allow commonholds to be used by developers on complex developments by creating sections that allow for commonholds to be built in phases and to cater for different needs, irrespective of their size, make-up or complexity so they can respond to the changing needs of the site as the building progresses. |
The current commonhold legislation has been criticised for being “one size fits all” and unsuited to more complex, mixed-use developments. |
|
Allow shared ownership leases and affordable housing to be included in commonhold. |
The inability to use these types of arrangement at the moment is a particular block on commonholds being built. To ensure that as many people as possible are able to buy in a commonhold development. |
|
Make commonholds more financially secure and change the way they are run so the properties are kept in good repair and properly insured; |
To improve the day-to-day operation of commonholds, enhancing the experience of the homeowners living within them |
|
Change the rules of commonhold and how costs are shared – every commonhold would have a set of rules governing the rights and obligations of the commonhold association and the unit owners. There would be no requirement to pay service charge, instead the commonhold association would demand "commonhold contributions" to cover shared costs with any minority interests being protected. |
Provide owners with a greater say on setting the commonhold’s costs and enhanced powers to take action against those who fail to pay their share. |
|
Every commonhold must maintain a fund towards future repairs, which will allow the cost of major works to be budgeted for over the years. If emergencies arise, provision is made for unit owners with easier ways of raising finance to undertake essential works |
To reduce the risk of large and unexpected bills |
|
Reforms to the content and layout of the commonhold’s rulebook (the commonhold community statement) |
To make it easier for owners to understand their rights and obligations within the building. |
|
Changes to make it harder to change the rules of the building |
To protect the expectations of those buying into the building, whilst ensuring that important changes can still be made. |
|
Empower the commonhold with sufficient enforcement powers. Where a change is made to the commonhold’s rulebook that particularly affects one of the owners, he/she will be able to apply to the Tribunal under a new regime of protection for the minority. |
Disputes to be resolved quickly |
|
Where owners or the association fail to comply with the rulebook, any disputes to be resolved quickly and informally, through commonhold’s bespoke dispute resolution process. |
New unique dispute resolution process for disputes to be resolved quickly and informally |
|
Protection of a lender's position in the unlikely event that a commonhold association is wound up. The Commonhold open letter to lenders is here which outlines the steps we have taken to address concerns raised with us by and on behalf of mortgage lenders during our work on commonhold.
|
Greater certainty to lenders that their interests will be protected, including in the unlikely event of a commonhold association’s insolvency, or on the termination of a commonhold at the end of a building’s useful life.
|