Refine your search

Tap 'View Results' to apply the filters.

Loading Results

19 People for "WA 0852 2611 9277 Jasa Interior HPL Rak TV Apartment Aston Bogor"

Paul Ewing

Paul Ewing

Partner, Real Estate
Edinburgh

View profile
Ibrahim Siddiki

Ibrahim Siddiki

Partner, Corporate, Co-Head of Saudi Arabia
Middle East

View profile

462 Results for "WA 0852 2611 9277 Jasa Interior HPL Rak TV Apartment Aston Bogor"

17 September 2019

ASA ruling on misleading representations of products

The ASA has upheld a complaint in relation to whether a TV ad for a Dyson fan and air purifier (the Dyson Pure Hot + Cool Fan) misleadingly implied that the product was cordless.

VAT on apartments: Revenue guidance in Ireland

The article summarises Revenue’s latest guidance on the reduced 9% VAT rate for the sale and construction of apartments and apartment blocks in Ireland, following the Budget 2026 announcement.

6 April 2018

Bribery Case Summary: R v Skansen Interiors Limited, Southwark Crown Court

In a recent bribery case, a company that was the first defendant to rely on the "adequate procedures" defence, was convicted of failing to prevent bribery. Discover more about the case and the salient learning points.

30 May 2018

Dismissal for misconduct which the employer didn't know was connected to the employee's disability was still discriminatory

In City of York Council v Grosset the Court of Appeal upheld an Employment Tribunal decision that an employer discriminated against a disabled employee by dismissing them for misconduct which arose in consequence of the employee's disability.

Employer's assurance regarding mirror benefits following transfer was contractually binding

the Pensions Ombudsman has found that an employer had given a legally binding assurance to provide a member with mirror benefits if he transferred his benefits to a new scheme following a restructuring.

25 November 2021

Court of Appeal finds moped courier with limited right of substitution was a worker

In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine, the Court of Appeal held that a delivery courier was a worker, even though he had a clause in his agreement which meant that he had a limited right of substitution. Find out more >


Page 1 of 58