Key themes and legal support. We are here to help.
In these challenging times, the reality of regulatory obligations and expectations do not disappear and they can be hard to juggle in the face of human need. In a series of briefings focussing on areas of key relevance for lenders at this unique moment in time, we set out some of our thoughts on the central issues lenders need to be thinking about.
There are a number of options available when offering forbearance to customers. Lenders may choose simply to enter into a new agreement. Alternatively they may choose to vary the existing agreement by entering into a modifying agreement or simply provide forbearance by waiving their contractual rights on a temporary basis.
If new credit agreements are the preferred option, careful thought will need to be given to the basis on which they are done and the processes that sit around them. If those new agreements involve paying off existing agreements and refinancing them over a longer term, they may require different drafting treatment under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) drafting rules from those agreements lenders already have prepared. New creditworthiness assessments will be needed and the procedures set out by the CCA for executing regulated credit agreements will need to be followed. Similarly, modifying agreements will require adherence to the complex drafting rules, the rules around executing credit agreements and the provision of copies.
Modifying agreements can be tricky but they are certainly more common that they used to be and, if lenders are aware of the issues and take appropriate steps to navigate the process correctly, they can be a sensible option. The real risk posed by modifying agreements is when they arise inadvertently through discussion with a customer without the lender intending to create a modifying agreement. This can easily occur in the context of discussions around repayment plans and forbearance. As the effect of a modifying agreement is to revoke and replace the original credit agreement, a lender can end up with an unenforceable credit agreement simply because they did not structure discussions around a repayment arrangement properly and did not document it in a way so to mitigate the risks of a modifying agreement arising.