We publish all our insights on LinkedIn. Follow Addleshaw Goddard Insights for all the latest legal developments, key regulatory changes and the issues that could affect you or your business.
Included in this issue: Commonality of trade mark has Birkenstock on the back foot; Buyer's Dream turned Buyer's Nightmare – the dangers of disregarding IP; Learning the lessons of publishing photographs on the internet without consent and more...
Commonality of trade mark has Birkenstock on the back foot
- Birkenstock unsuccessful in registering its shoe sole pattern as a trade mark
- Appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union
- What is the test for determining whether a sign comprising a repeating motif lacks distinctive character?
For further details click here
Buyer's Dream turned Buyer's Nightmare – the dangers of disregarding IP
- Individual creates IP while providing services to a company
- for tax reasons, the services are provided under a personal service company arrangement
- should the individual be considered an employee for IP law purposes?
For further details click here
Learning the lessons of publishing photographs on the internet without consent
- School pupil uses a photo from the internet as part of a school project
- School chooses to publish the pupil's report on its website
- CJEU interprets the scope of 'communication to the public' in the context of the posting on one website of a photograph previously posted, without any restrictions, on another website.
For further details click here
Court of Appeal hears healthy debate about construction of exclusive licence agreement
- Licence agreement gives licensee exclusive rights to use seven trade marks
- Licensor validly terminates the licence as regards five of the trade marks, on the grounds of non-use
- Can the licensor use those five marks without breaching the exclusivity of the licence?
For further details click here
Still no break for Nestlé in KitKat trade mark dispute
- Latest chapter in the long-running dispute concerning the validity of a 'four-fingered' three-dimensional trade mark
- European Court of Justice dismisses appeals brought by Nestlé, the EUIPO and Mondelēz
- What are the evidential requirements for demonstrating acquired distinctiveness?
For further details click here
European court gives a "lift" to brand owners
- Trader buys branded forklift trucks outside of the EEA, removes trade marks and adds its own distinctive signs
- No suggestion of trader using marks that are the same or similar to the brand owner's marks
- Does this amount to a breach of EU trade mark laws?