Refine your search

Tap 'View Results' to apply the filters.

Loading Results

20 People for "WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Bikin Meja TV Minimalis Olympic Awet Jatisrono Wonogiri"

Adam McCarron

Adam McCarron

Partner, Restructuring
London, UK

View profile
Paul Hirst

Paul Hirst

Partner, Global Infrastructure and Head of Transport
United Kingdom

View profile

372 Results for "WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Bikin Meja TV Minimalis Olympic Awet Jatisrono Wonogiri"

17 September 2019

ASA ruling on misleading representations of products

The ASA has upheld a complaint in relation to whether a TV ad for a Dyson fan and air purifier (the Dyson Pure Hot + Cool Fan) misleadingly implied that the product was cordless.

30 May 2018

Dismissal for misconduct which the employer didn't know was connected to the employee's disability was still discriminatory

In City of York Council v Grosset the Court of Appeal upheld an Employment Tribunal decision that an employer discriminated against a disabled employee by dismissing them for misconduct which arose in consequence of the employee's disability.

Employer's assurance regarding mirror benefits following transfer was contractually binding

the Pensions Ombudsman has found that an employer had given a legally binding assurance to provide a member with mirror benefits if he transferred his benefits to a new scheme following a restructuring.

25 November 2021

Court of Appeal finds moped courier with limited right of substitution was a worker

In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine, the Court of Appeal held that a delivery courier was a worker, even though he had a clause in his agreement which meant that he had a limited right of substitution. Find out more >

28 March 2019

TUPE: Dismissal based upon a poor working relationship was TUPE related

In Hare Wines Ltd v Kaur, the Court of Appeal held that a dismissal which occurred two days before a TUPE transfer, was TUPE related.

3 October 2018

TUPE: post-transfer removal of a travel allowance was not void

The EAT has held that the withdrawal of a contractual travel allowance following a TUPE transfer was not void under regulation 4(4) of TUPE. The variation of the terms of employment was due to the Respondent's conclusion that the allowance was outdated ...


Page 1 of 47